Software licensing: Are finance directors getting what they bargained for?

Tuesday, 11th March 2008 by David Mugenyi*
Software licensing: Are finance directors getting what they bargained for?

A recent report by Forrester Research argued that many enterprise software vendors are deliberately using complicated licensing models to make it more difficult for their customers to make comparisons between vendors' offerings.

What further complicates decision making for finance directors is that annual maintenance and support costs are rising while vendors seem to give discounts on licence fees. Forrester estimates that while in the past maintenance costs constituted between 18 and 25 per cent of licence fees, today the percentage is climbing towards 27 per cent.

This complexity makes it more difficult for FDs and financial controllers to make informed decisions and can also lock them into a treadmill of rising software costs.

How can they determine which technologies will deliver the best return on their investment if they don’t even know exactly what they’re paying for? For example, if a business is being charged ‘per CPU’ instead of ‘per socket’, it may end up paying up to four times as much for the software.

The increasing consolidation within the enterprise software market means that there is less of a drive for the increasingly monopolistic vendors to review their licensing. As a result, FDs are forced to simply pay up, under the impression that there's no choice, which in turn helps maintain the monopoly and keeps prices high. To get out of this vicious circle, FDs need to understand that there are alternatives out there.

With the increasingly uncertain global economic outlook, FDs and financial controllers under increasing pressure to find ways to minimise the potential impact on their business. An obvious solution is to cut overheads wherever possible, including a reduction in IT costs.

One option is for FDs and financial controllers to explore the option of swapping their high-cost and confusingly priced proprietary technologies for lower-cost, open source based alternatives. Thanks to companies such as Novell and Red Hat, open source technologies are no longer associated with instability or unreliability.

Instead, when supported by private enterprise, open source solutions allow businesses to reap the benefits of enterprise-class software at a fraction of the cost.In fact, this approach has been known to save businesses up to 50 per cent in IT costs annually over a typical five-year period.

By combining the cost advantages of open source  with commercial support, businesses are able to achieve the best of both worlds as performance, scalability, security and reliability of IT systems are not compromised.

FDs and financial controllers may struggle to keep track of what they are paying for because of overly complex and continually changing software licensing models.  Yet, some are realising that open source backed by private enterprise can be a viable means to moderate IT spend.

Swapping their established, high-cost proprietary technologies for lower-cost, clearly licensed, open source based alternatives allows them to reduce IT costs without jeopardising the reliable and scalable delivery of IT systems to support the business and to know exactly what they are paying for.

* David Mugenyi is financial controller for EMEA at EnterpriseDB

Picture source

Sponsored Link Brochures on Saving and investing

Leave a comment

Name:
Email:
Comment:
I have read and understand the terms and conditions

Please click the post button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

Focus on

Reducing your carbon footprint

Reducing your carbon footprint Businesses of all sizes are waking up to the fact that they can shave thousands of pounds off their energy bills by cutting their carbon emissions. We bring you up to speed on how to go about measuring and reducing your carbon footprint...

Daily Insights

Extra help eases IFRS transition
May 09, 2008 11:21am GMT

There are many schools of thought on how best to manage the transition to IFRS. Finance directors can hire external help or manage the change in-house with available resources. Aveva Group FD Paul Taylor says the engineering software organisation chose a hybrid option.

By Catherine Woods
newsletter
findout about RSS